Following discussion with stakeholders and consultation with a
range of University Committees, Northumbria University adopts the International
Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) working definition on antisemitism.
The University applies this definition in a manner
which is consistent with our guidance
on freedom of speech and to the rights of
students and staff to discuss difficult and sensitive topics, provided these rights
are exercised responsibly, within the law, and with respect for others who may have
differing views.
The IHRA working definition of antisemitism is:
“Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be
expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of
antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their
property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”
To guide IHRA in its work, the following examples may serve as
illustrations:
Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel,
conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar to
that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic.
Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to harm humanity, and it
is often used to blame Jews for “why things go wrong.” It is expressed in
speech, writing, visual forms and action, and employs sinister stereotypes and
negative character traits.
Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media,
schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account
the overall context, include, but are not limited to:
- Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
- Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
- Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.
- Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).
- Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
- Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
- Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
- Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
- Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
- Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
- Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.
Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law
(for example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic materials
in some countries).
Criminal acts are antisemitic when the targets of attacks, whether they
are people or property – such as buildings, schools, places of worship and
cemeteries – are selected because they are, or are perceived to be, Jewish or
linked to Jews.
Antisemitic discrimination is the denial to Jews of
opportunities or services available to others and is illegal in many countries.
For full background on the IHRA definition of Antisemitism, please click here
